-
Jason Yellick authored
Although gracefully leaving a channel might be a better option in the future, because this behavior is not compatible with v1.0.x gossip, and because of the complexity of this operation, a good first pass for v1.1 is simply to ensure that all processes panic if incompatible configuration is pushed to the channel. This CR causes the orderer to check for capabilities during the config validatiion process it already undertakes. It also causes the orderer to panic if a config block is committed which contains capabilities unknown to the orderer. Finally, on join channel and on config update, the peer checks the capabilities and panics on incompatibility. Change-Id: Ieeeaf7a1924c42e001a3a973873a4343f134a0ae Signed-off-by:
Binh Q. Nguyen <binhn@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
Jason Yellick <jyellick@us.ibm.com>
Jason Yellick authoredAlthough gracefully leaving a channel might be a better option in the future, because this behavior is not compatible with v1.0.x gossip, and because of the complexity of this operation, a good first pass for v1.1 is simply to ensure that all processes panic if incompatible configuration is pushed to the channel. This CR causes the orderer to check for capabilities during the config validatiion process it already undertakes. It also causes the orderer to panic if a config block is committed which contains capabilities unknown to the orderer. Finally, on join channel and on config update, the peer checks the capabilities and panics on incompatibility. Change-Id: Ieeeaf7a1924c42e001a3a973873a4343f134a0ae Signed-off-by:
Binh Q. Nguyen <binhn@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
Jason Yellick <jyellick@us.ibm.com>
Loading